When Gold Key (later Whitman) started producing comics based on the long-running Ripley's Belieive It or Not! newspaper strip, the publisher had issues devoted to singular subjects. There was an issue devoted to 'True War Stories'. One about 'Weird Stories' in general. A couple of issues about real life demons and monsters. But the subject matter in which Gold Key struck gold was in books devoted to real ghost stories.
By issue #30, every issue of Ripley's was devoted to the ghost tales. The public must have really eaten these spooky yarns up as another 64 issues of just 'True Ghost Stories' were published before giving up the ghost with issue #94 (February, 1980).
This October, 1977 issue tells 4 ghostly tales. A couple on the verge of divorce are given marriage counseling by a colonial specter. A pair of greedy men are haunted by the man whose untimely death has just made them very rich or has it? A widower and his son are swept away at sea only to be saved by the ghost of their deceased loved one. Finally, a family moves into a coastal cottage only to be visited by 'The Spectral Schooner.'
Yes, folks, it appears that even ships have ghosts.
Honestly, for late 1970s horror comics, this one is rather tame. DC loved to have its gruesome monsters. Marvel played a little too close to the gates of Hell. Charlton had it's horror hosts and femme fatales. Apparently, Gold Key/Whitman had ghosts and they were really tame. I've read early 1960s Comics Code horror scarier than these tales.
What sold me this book was the Ripley's name. I was a fan of the strips, the live TV show starring Jack Palance and I am a fan of the various museums and aquariums. When it came to creator Robert Ripley, the reason I kept coming back to his various endeavors was the provenance. Ripley would at least tell you the location of his strange discoveries. Sometimes you get a name and a date. There's none of that here with the comic book. As much as I would like to believe these encounters with the afterlife really happened, without some factoid with some references added, these ghost tales are lacking something; true or not.
I'm not really feeling motivated to go out and find more copies of this series. Even the artwork is generic. At its best, it looks like illustrations you'd find on the back of a magazine or Sears Catalog. Or it's what you'd expect from a really low-budget grade school textbook at worst. And this issue really was a mix of both types of artwork by uncredited artists.
Look, if I found a bunch of these in a bargain bin, I'd very well consider getting them for my collection. Less than a dollar a piece would be optimal. Otherwise, if I had to pick between these and the lowest of the low horror offerings from Charlton, I'd go with Charlton every time.
Rating: 4 out of 10 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment